Sarah,
I am very impressed with your blog choice. Not only is it awesome that you are able to reconnect on another level with this family from your past, but you are also able to enjoy what they are personally experiencing through their travels.
The aesthetics, as well as the posts of this blog, kept me interested and focused. I love that they are not only including their family, but the world, through their RSS feeds. It is an invaluable experience that they are offering their children, but in turn are also offering everyone else who doesn't have the same opportunities to travel as they do. They are educating so many to another terrain and culture.
Another superior asset of this blog is the photography. I was so impressed with the quality and purity of the photographs that accompany each post. Obviously, the authors are very gifted in photography, as well as expressing their thoughts and experiences.
I really enjoyed reading your review and visiting the blog itself!!
Thanks!
http://somersusa.com/public_html/FamilyBlog/FamilyNews2010/Blog/Blog.html
Saturday, December 18, 2010
Peer Blog Response - Jim Carman
Jim,
After visiting your acquaintance Alex's blog, I too was very impressed. He must obviously be very committed and knowledgeable in the technology field. After just reading the first three posts, which focused on PFD files, web browsers and service packs for video formats, I was thrilled at the amount of verifiable and valuable information that he has posted about.
The site itself is user friendly, although its format is rather quiet. It doesn't seem to hold my attention, but in turn, the posts themselves, are much more worthwhile. I also appreciate the older entries back button, which allowed me to move around his blog with ease and move back to my original starting point without any issues. Another valuable feature that I found on his blog was the text message update calendar. This is the first time that I have found this specific feature on any blog. I was very interested in this feature because I think that it would be a super asset to add to my own personal blog.
I'm sure that your friend Alex would be very impressed with your review. His blog is a noteworthy wealth of information for any individual looking for modern technology trends and old school technology problem solutions.
Thanks again for a great recommendation and review!
http://alexspencer.net/blog/
After visiting your acquaintance Alex's blog, I too was very impressed. He must obviously be very committed and knowledgeable in the technology field. After just reading the first three posts, which focused on PFD files, web browsers and service packs for video formats, I was thrilled at the amount of verifiable and valuable information that he has posted about.
The site itself is user friendly, although its format is rather quiet. It doesn't seem to hold my attention, but in turn, the posts themselves, are much more worthwhile. I also appreciate the older entries back button, which allowed me to move around his blog with ease and move back to my original starting point without any issues. Another valuable feature that I found on his blog was the text message update calendar. This is the first time that I have found this specific feature on any blog. I was very interested in this feature because I think that it would be a super asset to add to my own personal blog.
I'm sure that your friend Alex would be very impressed with your review. His blog is a noteworthy wealth of information for any individual looking for modern technology trends and old school technology problem solutions.
Thanks again for a great recommendation and review!
http://alexspencer.net/blog/
Unit IIII Blog Post - "Unwanted Opinions of a Teenage Liberal"
While I am a little hesitant to discuss the venue and abstract of this blog, I felt it was worth the time to note its subject matter, considering it was authored by a sixteen year old “liberal”. This declared liberal actually has an opinion on his surroundings and doesn’t hesitate to voice them. I think that that is my direct appeal to the blog,” Unwanted Opinions of a Teen Liberal”.
After thoroughly reviewing this blog and taking the time to ponder its messages and biases, I must admit that I became a follower. The blog, “Unwanted Opinions of a Teen Liberal”, is penned by a sixteen-year old, young man who is trying to be as abruptly honest and opinionated through his interpretations in life. I find this blog rather course and exhibiting grammatical and spelling errors galore, but also quite humorous, interesting and sincere. It is through this blog that I can hopefully interpret my daughter’s generation by understanding the candid, yet biased views on everything from the Garden of Eden and the serpent to the ravages of his generation and the author’s perception of how his generation is affected by previous generations and affects the future generations to come.
I must admit this blog will not interest everyone. Its home view is rather bland and if not for the posts, I would surely scoff it off as a typical teenager venting his frustrations to the world. The only interesting combination is the books background which leads the reader to believe that this young man is truly interested in his education. The blog author is rather vague in his bio and never discloses any personal information, other than the fact that he is sixteen. This impresses me, because at least the young man is concerned about his safety, or maybe it is just to protect him when he rudely condemns others or expresses opinions that others may reject.
The author, I must admit, has opinions that aren't based on video game plots. He really seems to genuinely question the world and seems to be openly conscious about his surroundings both at school and on the news. Considering that this blog is authored by a sixteen year old and it is his perspective that we are reading, I must admit that I am impressed. He considers political views, religious views and educational budget cuts which affect his learning. His biases are realistic plights that affect and concern each and every one of us on a daily basis.
Again this blog isn’t for everyone. It isn’t a tutorial or a teaching forum, but instead a response for all of us who deem our teenager’s generation caught up in vanity, greed and selfishness. This author, while biased, concerns himself with very important political and religious views, which I am quite sure you and I are concerned with.
http://unwantedopinionsofateenliberal.blogspot.com/2010_11_01_archive.html
After thoroughly reviewing this blog and taking the time to ponder its messages and biases, I must admit that I became a follower. The blog, “Unwanted Opinions of a Teen Liberal”, is penned by a sixteen-year old, young man who is trying to be as abruptly honest and opinionated through his interpretations in life. I find this blog rather course and exhibiting grammatical and spelling errors galore, but also quite humorous, interesting and sincere. It is through this blog that I can hopefully interpret my daughter’s generation by understanding the candid, yet biased views on everything from the Garden of Eden and the serpent to the ravages of his generation and the author’s perception of how his generation is affected by previous generations and affects the future generations to come.
I must admit this blog will not interest everyone. Its home view is rather bland and if not for the posts, I would surely scoff it off as a typical teenager venting his frustrations to the world. The only interesting combination is the books background which leads the reader to believe that this young man is truly interested in his education. The blog author is rather vague in his bio and never discloses any personal information, other than the fact that he is sixteen. This impresses me, because at least the young man is concerned about his safety, or maybe it is just to protect him when he rudely condemns others or expresses opinions that others may reject.
The author, I must admit, has opinions that aren't based on video game plots. He really seems to genuinely question the world and seems to be openly conscious about his surroundings both at school and on the news. Considering that this blog is authored by a sixteen year old and it is his perspective that we are reading, I must admit that I am impressed. He considers political views, religious views and educational budget cuts which affect his learning. His biases are realistic plights that affect and concern each and every one of us on a daily basis.
Again this blog isn’t for everyone. It isn’t a tutorial or a teaching forum, but instead a response for all of us who deem our teenager’s generation caught up in vanity, greed and selfishness. This author, while biased, concerns himself with very important political and religious views, which I am quite sure you and I are concerned with.
http://unwantedopinionsofateenliberal.blogspot.com/2010_11_01_archive.html
Sunday, December 5, 2010
Extra Credit Response Unit III
Travis,
While we may disagree on these two article validity', I did appreciate your opinion and informatics on gathering of population increase statement from Lindzen's blog post. It is something to consider, as is the study of global warming. To be honest my opinion on the validity of that point in Lindzen's argument has changed, because of your insight and interpretation. I disagree with his critical attacks for a forum of social education, but your un-refuted point that Lindzen makes is a demanding alternative to consider.
I think that in terms of Biello's argument, he was trying to focus on the most important topics that the IRCC Report was promoting to all countries versus a long-winded analysis of the scientific communities steadfast jargon.
Interesting Post!
While we may disagree on these two article validity', I did appreciate your opinion and informatics on gathering of population increase statement from Lindzen's blog post. It is something to consider, as is the study of global warming. To be honest my opinion on the validity of that point in Lindzen's argument has changed, because of your insight and interpretation. I disagree with his critical attacks for a forum of social education, but your un-refuted point that Lindzen makes is a demanding alternative to consider.
I think that in terms of Biello's argument, he was trying to focus on the most important topics that the IRCC Report was promoting to all countries versus a long-winded analysis of the scientific communities steadfast jargon.
Interesting Post!
Extra Credit Blog Response Unit III
Jacob,
I agree totally with your perception of the two articles. Lindzen does seem focused on discrediting Al Gore and his documentary on the global warming crisis versus defending his stand on un-founded global warming trends. With such astringent credentials you would think that Lindzen would want to publish his bias in a more supported light and not defame his own person blog. It is rather sad!!
On the other note of Biello, his bias isn't as blatant and he does use key points of documented evidence to support his opinion of the continuous downfall in the global warming cycle. I have found after reading some of the blog posts that decidedly, many of us do rely on facts versus opinions in order to found our beliefs of a scientific crisis or political view.
While we both interpreted the articles in the same context, it is interesting that it was certain quotes and sources that perpetrated us to do so.
Again I appreciate your opinion and agree totally.
Thanks for the informative blog post!!
I agree totally with your perception of the two articles. Lindzen does seem focused on discrediting Al Gore and his documentary on the global warming crisis versus defending his stand on un-founded global warming trends. With such astringent credentials you would think that Lindzen would want to publish his bias in a more supported light and not defame his own person blog. It is rather sad!!
On the other note of Biello, his bias isn't as blatant and he does use key points of documented evidence to support his opinion of the continuous downfall in the global warming cycle. I have found after reading some of the blog posts that decidedly, many of us do rely on facts versus opinions in order to found our beliefs of a scientific crisis or political view.
While we both interpreted the articles in the same context, it is interesting that it was certain quotes and sources that perpetrated us to do so.
Again I appreciate your opinion and agree totally.
Thanks for the informative blog post!!
Unit III Extra Credit Response - Sarah Linde
Sarah,
I must say that I do appreciate your refreshing opinion on the article reviews. While I must admit I do disagree, the reasons are a little bit different.
My directive for disagreement on persuasion of Lindzen's article was that it was a blog and traditionally blogs are biased by their authors, because they are personal insights and feelings.
I do appreciate Biello's article because it does offer a proven document that the reader is able to research on their own, without Biello's signatory bias.
While your point is refreshing about not requiring certain documented information in order to be convinced of a political or scientific forum, I look for un-refuted analysis by persuasion. I have a tendency to try to stick to statistical information and signature documents as my key persuaders.
Just as we are peers to one another's blogs, our opinions will vary and agree to disagree. This is similar to these two articles. They are advocating for two different views of a global issue through persuasion. I suppose the bottom line is who the better persuader portrays their view as....we all have certain values that will validate their influence on our opinions. This was interesting look at both articles!
Very informative Post!
I must say that I do appreciate your refreshing opinion on the article reviews. While I must admit I do disagree, the reasons are a little bit different.
My directive for disagreement on persuasion of Lindzen's article was that it was a blog and traditionally blogs are biased by their authors, because they are personal insights and feelings.
I do appreciate Biello's article because it does offer a proven document that the reader is able to research on their own, without Biello's signatory bias.
While your point is refreshing about not requiring certain documented information in order to be convinced of a political or scientific forum, I look for un-refuted analysis by persuasion. I have a tendency to try to stick to statistical information and signature documents as my key persuaders.
Just as we are peers to one another's blogs, our opinions will vary and agree to disagree. This is similar to these two articles. They are advocating for two different views of a global issue through persuasion. I suppose the bottom line is who the better persuader portrays their view as....we all have certain values that will validate their influence on our opinions. This was interesting look at both articles!
Very informative Post!
Unit III Blog Response Amanda Williford
Amanda,
I must admit our line of thinking is along the same parallel. It is a shame that Lindzen uses his blog forum as a stand for mockery and distaste for others, when he should be a posting a model post. His credentials, while admirable, are made personally defragmented by his ill-attempt at convincing his readers to dismiss global warming trends. The one reprieve that Lindzen has is that it is his blog and his forum of bias is allowed. Unfortunately his blog doesn’t have to serve any tasteful forum because it is his opinion. The downfall is that it doesn’t seem to sway anyone in favor for his unethical soapbox. It is sad that he seems to be more concerned with convincing defamation, than to sway his reader’s minds that there could possibly be a hidden truth of groundless global warming effects.
Also I am pleased that we both are sound in Biello's article in the Scientific American. He too is biased, but maintains legitimate sources to back up his founded truths of global warming trends.
While both authors are well credentialed, these articles show how far oppositions are on such controversial social issues’. These two articles also show the ignorance of single-minded intelligence!
Your comment about making the world livable and humanity stepping up for that, is a great ending to a serious issue that Lindzen seems to ignore.
Great Post!!
I must admit our line of thinking is along the same parallel. It is a shame that Lindzen uses his blog forum as a stand for mockery and distaste for others, when he should be a posting a model post. His credentials, while admirable, are made personally defragmented by his ill-attempt at convincing his readers to dismiss global warming trends. The one reprieve that Lindzen has is that it is his blog and his forum of bias is allowed. Unfortunately his blog doesn’t have to serve any tasteful forum because it is his opinion. The downfall is that it doesn’t seem to sway anyone in favor for his unethical soapbox. It is sad that he seems to be more concerned with convincing defamation, than to sway his reader’s minds that there could possibly be a hidden truth of groundless global warming effects.
Also I am pleased that we both are sound in Biello's article in the Scientific American. He too is biased, but maintains legitimate sources to back up his founded truths of global warming trends.
While both authors are well credentialed, these articles show how far oppositions are on such controversial social issues’. These two articles also show the ignorance of single-minded intelligence!
Your comment about making the world livable and humanity stepping up for that, is a great ending to a serious issue that Lindzen seems to ignore.
Great Post!!
Comp II Unit III Global Warming Trends
After reading Richard Linzen's blog post, No Global Warming, and David Biello's article in the Scientific American, State of the Science: Beyond the Worst Case Climate Change Scenario, I honestly smirked about both for just a moment. These two appeal arguments, representing distinct global trends, were slightly informative about the state of the environment. They were however biased and for a better use of words, "climatic".
Linzen's article while seemingly informative at first, wasn't persuasive on the grounds of unfounded global warming trends. He seems more in tune to discrediting both Al Gore and Bill Clinton in their attempts at revitalizing the global warming initiative. Because Al Gore is promoting his docu-drama, “An Inconvenient Truth,” in hopes of awakening humanity to the adversities of global warming, Linzen uses the pen to destroy Gore's pleas of global help, not to support his own cause of un-disruptive global warming effects. Linzen does make note of many cited references, all the while kicking in a dig at Gore and his initiates in the process. Yes, Linzen does site many sources for different inconsistent trends but what one should take into account are some of those sources. I am not implying that they aren't reliable sources, but a blog is a biased opinion of the host and the host's sources.
A unique example of source use in Linzen's blog is that of Greg Holland. "To be sure, there is one exception, Greg Holland of the National Center for Atmospheric Research in Boulder, Colo., who argues that it must be global warming because he can’t think of anything else." This statement is ironic to Linzen's entire argument of unfounded global warming trends. Essentially by dissecting this comment, first things first, using the comment, "because he can't think of anything else" in a persuasive cited blog argument is rather uncoupling, unpersuasive, and tacky. I am well aware of what he is implying with arguments of "lassitude" but it seems that he would use a solid, verifiable source to gain ground for unfounded global warming versus borderline sources that are refutable and don't scientifically support his position. Yikes!!
After reading Linzen's blog, I then progressed to David Biello's article in Scientific American. First and foremost, this article is biased, but with a scientific approach versus the appeal of character defamation. Biello is trying to inform society about global warming trends through the appeals of logic and ethos. It is fair to say that his resources seem to be a little bit more reputable, but that consideration is apparent with the medium of a scientific journal. Biello is referencing the "IPCC Synthesis Report" in order to strengthen his claim of pre-existing damage and what can possibly continue if we aren't sensitive and take action to the problems of global warming. This report is a reliable source for the world, not just an individual's opinion. The IPCC Report is a scientific community report that highlights the most important deterrents in the global warming crisis. Strength to Biello's article is the individual sub-headings of specific transitional trends in global warming, which are highlighted straight from this report.
Biello cites Stephen Schneider,"We are above the high scenario now," says climatologist Stephen Schneider of Stanford University, an IPCC lead author. "This is not a safe world." When Biello used Schneider as a reference, it further enforced the validity of his argument. He used a guiding force and lead author for a document that "130 Nations" are reviewing in order to address global warming concerns. This alone shows the seriousness of his plight in addressing global warming.
While both entries keep the reader engaged, it was for very different reasons. Global warming is a massive social issue. We are all affected by published documentation and in addition all have opinions on that documentation. With that in mind, I would prefer to hear facts from verifiable sources that are part of a scientific community that is pursuant in their motivations of saving the planet. That is my preference. I will avoid the soap-box media drama that prefers to undermine individuals, instead of giving cold-heard facts!
Works Cited
Biello, David. State of the Science: Beyond the Worst Case Climate Change Scenario. November 27, 2007. 4 December 2010.< http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=state-of-the-science-beyond-the-worst-climate-change-case
Lindzen, Richard. No Global Warming. 26 October 2006. 04 December 2010.
http://globalwarminghoax.wordpress.com/2006/10/26/richard-lindzen-no-global-warming/
Linzen's article while seemingly informative at first, wasn't persuasive on the grounds of unfounded global warming trends. He seems more in tune to discrediting both Al Gore and Bill Clinton in their attempts at revitalizing the global warming initiative. Because Al Gore is promoting his docu-drama, “An Inconvenient Truth,” in hopes of awakening humanity to the adversities of global warming, Linzen uses the pen to destroy Gore's pleas of global help, not to support his own cause of un-disruptive global warming effects. Linzen does make note of many cited references, all the while kicking in a dig at Gore and his initiates in the process. Yes, Linzen does site many sources for different inconsistent trends but what one should take into account are some of those sources. I am not implying that they aren't reliable sources, but a blog is a biased opinion of the host and the host's sources.
A unique example of source use in Linzen's blog is that of Greg Holland. "To be sure, there is one exception, Greg Holland of the National Center for Atmospheric Research in Boulder, Colo., who argues that it must be global warming because he can’t think of anything else." This statement is ironic to Linzen's entire argument of unfounded global warming trends. Essentially by dissecting this comment, first things first, using the comment, "because he can't think of anything else" in a persuasive cited blog argument is rather uncoupling, unpersuasive, and tacky. I am well aware of what he is implying with arguments of "lassitude" but it seems that he would use a solid, verifiable source to gain ground for unfounded global warming versus borderline sources that are refutable and don't scientifically support his position. Yikes!!
After reading Linzen's blog, I then progressed to David Biello's article in Scientific American. First and foremost, this article is biased, but with a scientific approach versus the appeal of character defamation. Biello is trying to inform society about global warming trends through the appeals of logic and ethos. It is fair to say that his resources seem to be a little bit more reputable, but that consideration is apparent with the medium of a scientific journal. Biello is referencing the "IPCC Synthesis Report" in order to strengthen his claim of pre-existing damage and what can possibly continue if we aren't sensitive and take action to the problems of global warming. This report is a reliable source for the world, not just an individual's opinion. The IPCC Report is a scientific community report that highlights the most important deterrents in the global warming crisis. Strength to Biello's article is the individual sub-headings of specific transitional trends in global warming, which are highlighted straight from this report.
Biello cites Stephen Schneider,"We are above the high scenario now," says climatologist Stephen Schneider of Stanford University, an IPCC lead author. "This is not a safe world." When Biello used Schneider as a reference, it further enforced the validity of his argument. He used a guiding force and lead author for a document that "130 Nations" are reviewing in order to address global warming concerns. This alone shows the seriousness of his plight in addressing global warming.
While both entries keep the reader engaged, it was for very different reasons. Global warming is a massive social issue. We are all affected by published documentation and in addition all have opinions on that documentation. With that in mind, I would prefer to hear facts from verifiable sources that are part of a scientific community that is pursuant in their motivations of saving the planet. That is my preference. I will avoid the soap-box media drama that prefers to undermine individuals, instead of giving cold-heard facts!
Works Cited
Biello, David. State of the Science: Beyond the Worst Case Climate Change Scenario. November 27, 2007. 4 December 2010.< http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=state-of-the-science-beyond-the-worst-climate-change-case
Lindzen, Richard. No Global Warming. 26 October 2006. 04 December 2010.
Monday, November 29, 2010
Extra Credit Response Unit II - Mark Templeton
Mark,
Wow! I appreciate the research that you did in order to make a definitive decision as to how you feel about this article. After reading your response, I was perhaps swayed a bit from my initial opinion and interpretation. As I have children and I am in the military, providing praise is a must. I think that my interpretation of Kohn’s article must be a little different though. "Good Job" is important regardless of the fact if you are an adult or child, but I feel that Kohn is inferring that a constant "Good Job" for menial tasks may not be the perfect response.
Kohn seems to pass on to me from his article that there should be a happy balance of praise and communication, in order to raise a child to be a functional adult that can adapt and flourish in society. I feel that Kohn is implying that communication is the key, throughout this entire article.
Regardless, "Good Job" is great as long it is praise for a "Good Job" that is well done. That is the value of opinion that I feel Kohn is relating to his readers. Furthermore, to appreciate the value for a major conquest in a really good job that has value and is well done is the greatest reward!
Thank you again for your insight and reflection in a real world work place. Your point of view, while different than mine, is a perfect example of how people need to hear "Good Job" for a job well done regardless of their age.
Great Post!
Wow! I appreciate the research that you did in order to make a definitive decision as to how you feel about this article. After reading your response, I was perhaps swayed a bit from my initial opinion and interpretation. As I have children and I am in the military, providing praise is a must. I think that my interpretation of Kohn’s article must be a little different though. "Good Job" is important regardless of the fact if you are an adult or child, but I feel that Kohn is inferring that a constant "Good Job" for menial tasks may not be the perfect response.
Kohn seems to pass on to me from his article that there should be a happy balance of praise and communication, in order to raise a child to be a functional adult that can adapt and flourish in society. I feel that Kohn is implying that communication is the key, throughout this entire article.
Regardless, "Good Job" is great as long it is praise for a "Good Job" that is well done. That is the value of opinion that I feel Kohn is relating to his readers. Furthermore, to appreciate the value for a major conquest in a really good job that has value and is well done is the greatest reward!
Thank you again for your insight and reflection in a real world work place. Your point of view, while different than mine, is a perfect example of how people need to hear "Good Job" for a job well done regardless of their age.
Great Post!
Extra Credit Response Unit II Dayna Clark
Dayna,
BRAVO!! You covered this article in entirety. I was super thrilled at your insight and opinions that Kohn has offered through his appeals. Your right, regardless of who you are, this article will bring you in based on many different emotions of pathos.
I, as a parent, read this article and to be honest I wasn't offended or put off at all. I was intrigued! When I read and interpreted it, I was decidedly swayed into Kohn’s argument and opinion. It is hard to be a parent and try to raise your children to be compassionate, sharing, respectful and loving individuals in today’s society. There are too many mitigating factors that influence a parenting style. I must admit that I do agree with the whole ideology of "Good Job". We are all guilty of this phrase regardless if we are parents or not. I too say "Good Job", but I try to be choicer of when and how I say it.
As society is ever-changing, I understand the implications’ that Kohn is trying to express. In my interpretation and opinion, a constant "Good Job" could possibly lead to emotional and peer issues. The biggest result in my opinion is that of entitlement. A child may constantly always expect and never develop a sense of a real "Good Job" well done!
Again thanks for really digging into this article. I really enjoyed your perspective and post!
BRAVO!! You covered this article in entirety. I was super thrilled at your insight and opinions that Kohn has offered through his appeals. Your right, regardless of who you are, this article will bring you in based on many different emotions of pathos.
I, as a parent, read this article and to be honest I wasn't offended or put off at all. I was intrigued! When I read and interpreted it, I was decidedly swayed into Kohn’s argument and opinion. It is hard to be a parent and try to raise your children to be compassionate, sharing, respectful and loving individuals in today’s society. There are too many mitigating factors that influence a parenting style. I must admit that I do agree with the whole ideology of "Good Job". We are all guilty of this phrase regardless if we are parents or not. I too say "Good Job", but I try to be choicer of when and how I say it.
As society is ever-changing, I understand the implications’ that Kohn is trying to express. In my interpretation and opinion, a constant "Good Job" could possibly lead to emotional and peer issues. The biggest result in my opinion is that of entitlement. A child may constantly always expect and never develop a sense of a real "Good Job" well done!
Again thanks for really digging into this article. I really enjoyed your perspective and post!
Extra Credit Response Unit II Darryl Overstreet
Darryl,
I must say although I didn't exactly interpret the article as you did, I did find some of your points valid. I don't think that Kohn was specifically saying not to praise your child, but for them to see the bigger picture in avenues of praise, sharing, respect and generosity. I as a parent have suffered with having high expectations for my children. I must admit that I feel that sometimes constant praise breeds a form of entitlement in our children. They rely on us as their parents to teach them and we must prepare them for the praise they may get as they progress through the challenges in life. I fell that Kohn may be implying that with the right type of praise and communication with our children, we may possibly help them with their successes and failures as far as dealing with them emotionally.
Praise is praise no matter how you want to implore it. Kohn seems to push more of a communicative state with children versus telling them "Good Job" for everything. We are all guilty of these idiocies, but for the most part it seems that his point was supported and well structured.
Either way I really enjoyed your opposition in your blog post. Thank you for shedding a different perspective on this article!
I must say although I didn't exactly interpret the article as you did, I did find some of your points valid. I don't think that Kohn was specifically saying not to praise your child, but for them to see the bigger picture in avenues of praise, sharing, respect and generosity. I as a parent have suffered with having high expectations for my children. I must admit that I feel that sometimes constant praise breeds a form of entitlement in our children. They rely on us as their parents to teach them and we must prepare them for the praise they may get as they progress through the challenges in life. I fell that Kohn may be implying that with the right type of praise and communication with our children, we may possibly help them with their successes and failures as far as dealing with them emotionally.
Praise is praise no matter how you want to implore it. Kohn seems to push more of a communicative state with children versus telling them "Good Job" for everything. We are all guilty of these idiocies, but for the most part it seems that his point was supported and well structured.
Either way I really enjoyed your opposition in your blog post. Thank you for shedding a different perspective on this article!
Unit II Response to Michael Leonard
Michael,
For the most part I believe we both see eye to eye on this ethical argument. I don't think that Kohn was implying to completely eliminate all praise, because after all we as parents are the first and last teachers of our children. I just read more into the reasoning to not praise for everything. After all, I think that he as a parent is just as vulnerable as we are, which makes the appeal of pathos come into play. Maybe his reward or praise structure is more based on having a conversation with your child, rather than to automatically jump up and praise them for the more simple tasks, regardless of the reason. I can see how as a parent sometimes this is really difficult. Haven't we all been there? This article seems like it could be construed as a guideline or tutorial that could assist any parent who is struggling with a child that needs that guidance.
This argument as you infer is loaded with logos, pathos, and ethos. I am a parent and while all of these appeals reach out to me in different ways, the reality is that we are the teachers of our children and we must find that medium that teaches them to be prepared for both the social and emotional deterrents in life. Kohn seems to make that his mission statement.
Great blog response!
For the most part I believe we both see eye to eye on this ethical argument. I don't think that Kohn was implying to completely eliminate all praise, because after all we as parents are the first and last teachers of our children. I just read more into the reasoning to not praise for everything. After all, I think that he as a parent is just as vulnerable as we are, which makes the appeal of pathos come into play. Maybe his reward or praise structure is more based on having a conversation with your child, rather than to automatically jump up and praise them for the more simple tasks, regardless of the reason. I can see how as a parent sometimes this is really difficult. Haven't we all been there? This article seems like it could be construed as a guideline or tutorial that could assist any parent who is struggling with a child that needs that guidance.
This argument as you infer is loaded with logos, pathos, and ethos. I am a parent and while all of these appeals reach out to me in different ways, the reality is that we are the teachers of our children and we must find that medium that teaches them to be prepared for both the social and emotional deterrents in life. Kohn seems to make that his mission statement.
Great blog response!
Unit II Blog Post ..."Five Reasons to Stop Saying "Good Job!"
"Five Reasons to Stop Saying "Good Job!" is a supported and valid argument of the possible detriment to our children's emotional attitude toward themselves, others and society in general. Kohn emphasizes that due to constant praise and reward of personally expected behaviors, repercussions of social acceptance may arise. It is through this article that a depiction of a valid perspective on the praise of "Good Job" is described. We are all guilty of praising and offering rewards for certain characteristics and behaviors; that "we" employ as good, just and right. Kohn is blatant in the reality of this never-ending cycle and offers a gradual solution to preparing our youth for their future.
As a father of two, I used to constantly reward and praise my children for everything from flushing the toilet to picking up a toy. Please note that I say used too.... As I have matured and my children have grown older, I have learned that constant praise doesn't necessarily resolve or entice my children to correct the initial problem. I agree with Kohn when he implies that we are guilty of praising with "Good Job", of what we as a parent or educator feel is a good job. But in reality it is the premise of again what "we" feel is a good job and not necessarily a whole encompassing good job, that is perceived by educators and peers. For example praising for cleaning up a toy as a good job is nice but it eventually, speaking as a parent, will wear off. One toy is a great job but what about that whole playroom of toys that are still laying helplessly everywhere. The child eventually seems to land at an emotional place of entitlement and constant approval of only their parents expected "Good Job" and not as a learned social whole.
I appreciate Kohn's argument. The validity is there. We as parents, educators and society as a whole, are constantly praising for the small things and the intended child eventually just accepts that they are going to be praised, regardless of the action, task or behavior. Kohn appeals to his audience through pathos, logos, ethos and kairos throughout this ideal of what is a "Good Job". Using direct reference material by psychologists and professors, Kohn is able to offer his credibility through research or the appeal of ethos; the argument is supported with credible sources. His play on his readers emotion while visible can be construed in a variety of different ways. I interpreted the pathos of this emotional article to be enlightening and an emotional way to be supportive of my children in the right way, while others could possibly construe the argument as a judgement on how they are supposed to be raising their children. It is the emotional imprint of the article that could be considered slightly controversial, because Kohn seems to have a tendency to direct and lecture on the right way to praise your child. The logos or logical appeal of this article is directed at a specific group of readers. They are primarily parents, family, or educators that are in contact with children constantly. This targeted audience will have the most to gain and reflect upon after reading this article. The entire encompassing kairos of this article is very fitting during today's conflicting arguments of child rearing in society. We constantly hear horror stories of the "perfect child". They were great students, athletically involved, attending Church, and so on, but now they are in a juvenile detention hall for murder. While I know that I am interpreting this article to an extreme, it is fitting considering the state of our youth today. Kohn has penned at a perfect time and place. Hopefully his argument of "Good Job", will help parents take steps to not only praise their children in a healthy emotional way, as well as prepare them for the successes and failures, throughout their entire life.
http://www.alfiekohn.org/parenting/gj.htm
As a father of two, I used to constantly reward and praise my children for everything from flushing the toilet to picking up a toy. Please note that I say used too.... As I have matured and my children have grown older, I have learned that constant praise doesn't necessarily resolve or entice my children to correct the initial problem. I agree with Kohn when he implies that we are guilty of praising with "Good Job", of what we as a parent or educator feel is a good job. But in reality it is the premise of again what "we" feel is a good job and not necessarily a whole encompassing good job, that is perceived by educators and peers. For example praising for cleaning up a toy as a good job is nice but it eventually, speaking as a parent, will wear off. One toy is a great job but what about that whole playroom of toys that are still laying helplessly everywhere. The child eventually seems to land at an emotional place of entitlement and constant approval of only their parents expected "Good Job" and not as a learned social whole.
I appreciate Kohn's argument. The validity is there. We as parents, educators and society as a whole, are constantly praising for the small things and the intended child eventually just accepts that they are going to be praised, regardless of the action, task or behavior. Kohn appeals to his audience through pathos, logos, ethos and kairos throughout this ideal of what is a "Good Job". Using direct reference material by psychologists and professors, Kohn is able to offer his credibility through research or the appeal of ethos; the argument is supported with credible sources. His play on his readers emotion while visible can be construed in a variety of different ways. I interpreted the pathos of this emotional article to be enlightening and an emotional way to be supportive of my children in the right way, while others could possibly construe the argument as a judgement on how they are supposed to be raising their children. It is the emotional imprint of the article that could be considered slightly controversial, because Kohn seems to have a tendency to direct and lecture on the right way to praise your child. The logos or logical appeal of this article is directed at a specific group of readers. They are primarily parents, family, or educators that are in contact with children constantly. This targeted audience will have the most to gain and reflect upon after reading this article. The entire encompassing kairos of this article is very fitting during today's conflicting arguments of child rearing in society. We constantly hear horror stories of the "perfect child". They were great students, athletically involved, attending Church, and so on, but now they are in a juvenile detention hall for murder. While I know that I am interpreting this article to an extreme, it is fitting considering the state of our youth today. Kohn has penned at a perfect time and place. Hopefully his argument of "Good Job", will help parents take steps to not only praise their children in a healthy emotional way, as well as prepare them for the successes and failures, throughout their entire life.
http://www.alfiekohn.org/parenting/gj.htm
Sunday, November 7, 2010
Extra Credit Response Unit I Sarah
Sarah,
Thank you for sharing in my same belief. I am a father to two daughters, one being of an age where I am a nervous wreck.
Too be blunt, I will voice it and say yes I have put my teenage daughter on birth control. While it is hard to do, the reality is I am not naive to the world.
With the opportunity of free birth control, I am completely for the possibility and reality. We live in a culture unlike what we as young adults experienced. While I am not promoting promiscuity,very much like you, I am saying that I know the consequence and I want my children to understand them and be prepared.
Reducing teenage pregnancy by offering free birth control is one of the most aggressive advances we can make in the future. While the promotion of free birth control is an aggravating factor to many, the reality is that our earth is growing at a pace much faster than we can accommodate. There are so many reasons for free birth control, but first and foremost, I see it as a safety measure to protect our youth.
Thank you for being honest, voicing your opinion and setting the stage for reality. How refreshing for someone to utilize an ethical appeal and in my opinion logical appeal, to educate others on such a controversial topic.
Very informative blog! Thanks!
Thank you for sharing in my same belief. I am a father to two daughters, one being of an age where I am a nervous wreck.
Too be blunt, I will voice it and say yes I have put my teenage daughter on birth control. While it is hard to do, the reality is I am not naive to the world.
With the opportunity of free birth control, I am completely for the possibility and reality. We live in a culture unlike what we as young adults experienced. While I am not promoting promiscuity,very much like you, I am saying that I know the consequence and I want my children to understand them and be prepared.
Reducing teenage pregnancy by offering free birth control is one of the most aggressive advances we can make in the future. While the promotion of free birth control is an aggravating factor to many, the reality is that our earth is growing at a pace much faster than we can accommodate. There are so many reasons for free birth control, but first and foremost, I see it as a safety measure to protect our youth.
Thank you for being honest, voicing your opinion and setting the stage for reality. How refreshing for someone to utilize an ethical appeal and in my opinion logical appeal, to educate others on such a controversial topic.
Very informative blog! Thanks!
Extra Credit Response Unit I Blog - Jennifer Bloodworth
Jennifer,
Wow! You hit the nail on the head. I agree that teaching starts at home and ends at home. This is a never ending journey,their education, that we take with our children. We are the first teachers and will most likely be their last, they learn from us!
I agree that due to unions, the bad teachers are aloud to remain. But the question is where they always bad, or are they burned out by years of educational and uninvolved parenting abuse? It is said to say, but not everyone shares our passion of educating our children. I have run the gamut of individuals who feel that it is a public schools job to provide the education. The downfall is that a specific teacher may start out with dreams and goals of making a difference but when they are faced with teaching, parenting, potty-training, providing discipline, and most importantly love, they too sometimes get drained and lose sight of their first love, teaching our children.
While financial cut backs and downsizing have drained some of our teachers, I see that one of the biggest problems are the parents who don't parent and teach at home. They expect someone else to do their job. How sad that a super-fantastic teacher has bottomed out and has no enthusiasm left for their job, because of the losses they see in the everyday family.
It is up to everyone of us to parent and teach our children and not leave it all up to the educator. Thank god for the educators with the Patience of Job, Grace and Goodness of God, and metabolism of the Olympic athlete!
Great blog, it was fantastic and really hit home!
Wow! You hit the nail on the head. I agree that teaching starts at home and ends at home. This is a never ending journey,their education, that we take with our children. We are the first teachers and will most likely be their last, they learn from us!
I agree that due to unions, the bad teachers are aloud to remain. But the question is where they always bad, or are they burned out by years of educational and uninvolved parenting abuse? It is said to say, but not everyone shares our passion of educating our children. I have run the gamut of individuals who feel that it is a public schools job to provide the education. The downfall is that a specific teacher may start out with dreams and goals of making a difference but when they are faced with teaching, parenting, potty-training, providing discipline, and most importantly love, they too sometimes get drained and lose sight of their first love, teaching our children.
While financial cut backs and downsizing have drained some of our teachers, I see that one of the biggest problems are the parents who don't parent and teach at home. They expect someone else to do their job. How sad that a super-fantastic teacher has bottomed out and has no enthusiasm left for their job, because of the losses they see in the everyday family.
It is up to everyone of us to parent and teach our children and not leave it all up to the educator. Thank god for the educators with the Patience of Job, Grace and Goodness of God, and metabolism of the Olympic athlete!
Great blog, it was fantastic and really hit home!
Extra Credit Response Comp II - Darryl Overstreet
Darryl,
I too feel your discouragement in our educational foundations. I am in awe that with mass revenue coming in from casinos, that your educational system is still being passed over. I would question where that money is actually going. It us remarkable that as a society we can talk about the avenues for funding, show the avenues for funding and make promises for the future, but sadly nothing more is done to advance the proper route of financial competency. While I am vaguely familiar with the SQ 744 proposal; only by what I am reading from your blog and a few online articles, it amazes me of the ignored agenda and the unfulfilled promises.
While I don't reside in Oklahoma, Virginia is just as misguided and mistrusted in their educational promises. Property taxes are outrageous, educators are taken for granted, government funding is providing for children whose parents are serving their country and unevenly distributed, but still there is never money for the acquisitions that are so desperately needed in terms of our children's education and future. How sad it is that we only want the best for our child's education, but yet our governmental support structure always seems to fall short, unless they are over-taxing or taking from other broken programs.
Thanks for the insight and emotional appeal. It is an outrage what we have to fight for to educate our children!
I too feel your discouragement in our educational foundations. I am in awe that with mass revenue coming in from casinos, that your educational system is still being passed over. I would question where that money is actually going. It us remarkable that as a society we can talk about the avenues for funding, show the avenues for funding and make promises for the future, but sadly nothing more is done to advance the proper route of financial competency. While I am vaguely familiar with the SQ 744 proposal; only by what I am reading from your blog and a few online articles, it amazes me of the ignored agenda and the unfulfilled promises.
While I don't reside in Oklahoma, Virginia is just as misguided and mistrusted in their educational promises. Property taxes are outrageous, educators are taken for granted, government funding is providing for children whose parents are serving their country and unevenly distributed, but still there is never money for the acquisitions that are so desperately needed in terms of our children's education and future. How sad it is that we only want the best for our child's education, but yet our governmental support structure always seems to fall short, unless they are over-taxing or taking from other broken programs.
Thanks for the insight and emotional appeal. It is an outrage what we have to fight for to educate our children!
Response to Unit I Blog - Michael Lenoard
Michael,
I really appreciate the topic and subject matter. First let me say I whole heartily agree with you about the money, it always seems to be the bottom line, or beginning line, or it seems that money is all that matters! How much, how quickly, and who the money can be made for. While I am a college ball fan, watch college ball religiously and seriously enjoy watching the talent come up, I prefer that it remain the way it is. Spending dollars on internal investigations into the BCS is a shameful way to throw needed money out the door. This is college ball, we haven't progressed to the NFL yet. I feel the need to say that college ball is about rounding out new talent and helping them achieve their dreams. It isn't about the big dollars, but the reality is that it is moving that way. So wasting money to investigate only seems to show how easy it is to through money away on certain things that need to be left alone.
It isn't about how much money the schools and college ball system can make... or maybe it is! They haven't made it to the big leagues so don't treat it like the NFL.
Again I appreciate your point of view and the subject matter was ideal for the time of year.
I really appreciate the topic and subject matter. First let me say I whole heartily agree with you about the money, it always seems to be the bottom line, or beginning line, or it seems that money is all that matters! How much, how quickly, and who the money can be made for. While I am a college ball fan, watch college ball religiously and seriously enjoy watching the talent come up, I prefer that it remain the way it is. Spending dollars on internal investigations into the BCS is a shameful way to throw needed money out the door. This is college ball, we haven't progressed to the NFL yet. I feel the need to say that college ball is about rounding out new talent and helping them achieve their dreams. It isn't about the big dollars, but the reality is that it is moving that way. So wasting money to investigate only seems to show how easy it is to through money away on certain things that need to be left alone.
It isn't about how much money the schools and college ball system can make... or maybe it is! They haven't made it to the big leagues so don't treat it like the NFL.
Again I appreciate your point of view and the subject matter was ideal for the time of year.
Unit I Blog - 2011 Military Pay Debacle NDAA 2011 (H.R.5136) - Reduce Military Size or Cut Pay?
The NDAA 2011 (H.R. 5136) or National Defense Authorization Act for 2011 has been put on hold due to the most recent elections. While I'm sure your wondering what I am referring to with bill numbers and abbreviations, the National Defense Authorization Act decides and dictates the current designated spending for the military. Unfortunately, this year's agenda is looking to cut a budget that is already shoestring thin, by either reducing military size, military special pay, or both. The newly elected politician results are in, but the NDAA 2011 undecided results aren't looking very promising.
This year, 2010,has been a major charade and debacle, in regards to military pay raises and military spending. The government is looking to cut corners and apparently the military is the place to go. There are three major concerns that our sailors, soldiers and airmen should be looking at within the 2011 NDAA. The first is whether the Senate will approve the discriminatory and minimal pay raise for service members. 1.4% proposed by the Senate and President, or 1.9% proposed by the House; obviously they are both repugnant, but, hey, a raise is a raise.
The other two critical proposals on the 2011 NDAA are whether or not to cut our military forces, or cut the existing military pay, or both. While both of these proposals are redundant, the government is going to do what they have to do to save money, regardless of its hardship impacts.
Included in pay cuts are the special duty allowances for military service members. These include eliminating tax free war zone pay, hazardous duty pay, special duty pay, and family leave and separation pay. By eliminating these pays, hardships and cohesion breaks will subtly set in. Obviously, there is overspending in all of our branches of the service, but the notion is that the military is making more across the board than the allowable ECI-Employment Cost Index. Okay, I have to be honest about this index, someone needs to explain to me why they are willing to cut pay,cut troops, and downsize in general for financial reasons, but in return higher on GSA employees and contractors to make on average almost 3 times the same amount of money of the man they just discharged, while offering an over-generous benefits package. This game of truth or consequences has too many hardships at risk, and the negative outcome will sadly discourage faith in America but its people.
While our economy is struggling, with bolstered media reports of an assumed financial recovery, cutting military pay and reducing our military size is an unfortunate and ignorant way to stay the crisis. If the government decides to downsize military forces, we will see a surge in the employment market, which will re-create our unemployment conundrum. With employment reduction comes individuals looking for alternative work. Apparently, we as a country can not handle the surging unemployment market, just think what a major military overhaul will produce. Most assuredly unemployment lines will continue to wind around the local and state employment security commission offices.
Reducing military size also puts America in a very vulnerable state. Technically we are still at war. Not only will this proposal add additional pressure onto a morale-deprived and weakened cohesive unit, but it will also require many to perform additional duties that they may be unprepared or uneducated to take on. It then becomes a burden of a weakened military to perform at 100% with only 75% staffing. Unquestionable problems are bound to inundate our ranks.
After consideration of military reduction has played out, the other recommendation is to reduce or stop special duty pay. To be honest, speaking as a sailor in the United States Navy, this will most assuredly cause a hardship. Special duty pays include such pays as family leave and separation, combat pay, tax-free war zone pay, SD AP for recruiters, and other additional incentive pays which specific sailors and soldiers work hard to attain, by additional education and taking on collateral duties. To reduce or remove these special payments will create a cohesion hardship, financial hardship, and morale hardship. It is through special pays that sailors and soldiers receive recognition for hard work and dedication to their country.
While this year's pay raises are criminally defunct, what should be a majority concern is the reduction in troops, reduction in pay or both. Our House and Senate still haven't come forth with a resolution to budget cuts in the military. Although I am sure that it will be soon, we as the people must really consider what these budget cuts will mean to both the military family and the civilian economy. Limited troops and limited pay can quite possibly spin our financial crisis right back to where it started, when we were sure that it was coming to an end.
http://militaryadvantage.military.com/2010/10/congressional-politics-leaves-military-pay-hanging/
http://militaryadvantage.military.com/2010/10/2011-military-pay-debate/?wh=benefits
http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d111:HR05136:@@@J
This year, 2010,has been a major charade and debacle, in regards to military pay raises and military spending. The government is looking to cut corners and apparently the military is the place to go. There are three major concerns that our sailors, soldiers and airmen should be looking at within the 2011 NDAA. The first is whether the Senate will approve the discriminatory and minimal pay raise for service members. 1.4% proposed by the Senate and President, or 1.9% proposed by the House; obviously they are both repugnant, but, hey, a raise is a raise.
The other two critical proposals on the 2011 NDAA are whether or not to cut our military forces, or cut the existing military pay, or both. While both of these proposals are redundant, the government is going to do what they have to do to save money, regardless of its hardship impacts.
Included in pay cuts are the special duty allowances for military service members. These include eliminating tax free war zone pay, hazardous duty pay, special duty pay, and family leave and separation pay. By eliminating these pays, hardships and cohesion breaks will subtly set in. Obviously, there is overspending in all of our branches of the service, but the notion is that the military is making more across the board than the allowable ECI-Employment Cost Index. Okay, I have to be honest about this index, someone needs to explain to me why they are willing to cut pay,cut troops, and downsize in general for financial reasons, but in return higher on GSA employees and contractors to make on average almost 3 times the same amount of money of the man they just discharged, while offering an over-generous benefits package. This game of truth or consequences has too many hardships at risk, and the negative outcome will sadly discourage faith in America but its people.
While our economy is struggling, with bolstered media reports of an assumed financial recovery, cutting military pay and reducing our military size is an unfortunate and ignorant way to stay the crisis. If the government decides to downsize military forces, we will see a surge in the employment market, which will re-create our unemployment conundrum. With employment reduction comes individuals looking for alternative work. Apparently, we as a country can not handle the surging unemployment market, just think what a major military overhaul will produce. Most assuredly unemployment lines will continue to wind around the local and state employment security commission offices.
Reducing military size also puts America in a very vulnerable state. Technically we are still at war. Not only will this proposal add additional pressure onto a morale-deprived and weakened cohesive unit, but it will also require many to perform additional duties that they may be unprepared or uneducated to take on. It then becomes a burden of a weakened military to perform at 100% with only 75% staffing. Unquestionable problems are bound to inundate our ranks.
After consideration of military reduction has played out, the other recommendation is to reduce or stop special duty pay. To be honest, speaking as a sailor in the United States Navy, this will most assuredly cause a hardship. Special duty pays include such pays as family leave and separation, combat pay, tax-free war zone pay, SD AP for recruiters, and other additional incentive pays which specific sailors and soldiers work hard to attain, by additional education and taking on collateral duties. To reduce or remove these special payments will create a cohesion hardship, financial hardship, and morale hardship. It is through special pays that sailors and soldiers receive recognition for hard work and dedication to their country.
While this year's pay raises are criminally defunct, what should be a majority concern is the reduction in troops, reduction in pay or both. Our House and Senate still haven't come forth with a resolution to budget cuts in the military. Although I am sure that it will be soon, we as the people must really consider what these budget cuts will mean to both the military family and the civilian economy. Limited troops and limited pay can quite possibly spin our financial crisis right back to where it started, when we were sure that it was coming to an end.
http://militaryadvantage.military.com/2010/10/congressional-politics-leaves-military-pay-hanging/
http://militaryadvantage.military.com/2010/10/2011-military-pay-debate/?wh=benefits
http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d111:HR05136:@@@J
Saturday, July 31, 2010
Extra Credit Response to William Crawford's Unit IIII Blog
William,
First of all, both of your blog choices are superior. Honestly, I was unfamiliar with either one, but now that I am, I feel better informed on a variety of topics.
http://johnmaxwellonleadership.com/, a blog by John Maxwell, really caught my attention. Maxwell's speaking and writing abilities are very motivational. I enjoyed reading quite a few his recent entries. One entry specifically remain in my thoughtouts; "The Power of Words on a Page". This entry immediately caught my eye because it made reference to Walt Whitman, and after that I was sold. Maxwell seems to offer a wealth of knowledge that he channels into mentoring motivation. I could see how he could orally prompt someone to change their lifestyle and life plan.
John Maxwell's insights are intriguing and can invite and keep the readers attention. I have now subscribed to his blog, and I hope to gain some of the insight that you have from his leadership abilities.
Your reviews were great. Thanks so much for introducing me to John Maxwell. Great Job!!
First of all, both of your blog choices are superior. Honestly, I was unfamiliar with either one, but now that I am, I feel better informed on a variety of topics.
http://johnmaxwellonleadership.com/, a blog by John Maxwell, really caught my attention. Maxwell's speaking and writing abilities are very motivational. I enjoyed reading quite a few his recent entries. One entry specifically remain in my thoughtouts; "The Power of Words on a Page". This entry immediately caught my eye because it made reference to Walt Whitman, and after that I was sold. Maxwell seems to offer a wealth of knowledge that he channels into mentoring motivation. I could see how he could orally prompt someone to change their lifestyle and life plan.
John Maxwell's insights are intriguing and can invite and keep the readers attention. I have now subscribed to his blog, and I hope to gain some of the insight that you have from his leadership abilities.
Your reviews were great. Thanks so much for introducing me to John Maxwell. Great Job!!
Extra Credit Response to Lowell Harris's Blog
Lowell,
I am quite opposite in that I have found a few chosen blogs, and I follow them regularly. I do agree though, that it is very time consuming to search and follow blogs. It is always easier to find the specifics that your are looking for and stay with them for a busy life's sake.
I went to http://thebridgetosomewhere.com and previewed the site. It was a very personal blog, but intense and thought provoking. The blogger template isn't very eye catching, so initially I probably wouldn't have read that far into the site, but I am glad that I did.
I really appreciated the blog entries and some of the ideas that they proposed. They are informative and peaceful. The most eye catching, was the entry of the baby sea turtles. I can honestly say that I have never personally experienced seeing them close up and the picture in the entry was great.
I completely agree with your review of the blog. The entries offer a different thought process and push the reader to explore from within. Thanks for introducing me to such a simple, but yet compelling blog. Great review!
I am quite opposite in that I have found a few chosen blogs, and I follow them regularly. I do agree though, that it is very time consuming to search and follow blogs. It is always easier to find the specifics that your are looking for and stay with them for a busy life's sake.
I went to http://thebridgetosomewhere.com and previewed the site. It was a very personal blog, but intense and thought provoking. The blogger template isn't very eye catching, so initially I probably wouldn't have read that far into the site, but I am glad that I did.
I really appreciated the blog entries and some of the ideas that they proposed. They are informative and peaceful. The most eye catching, was the entry of the baby sea turtles. I can honestly say that I have never personally experienced seeing them close up and the picture in the entry was great.
I completely agree with your review of the blog. The entries offer a different thought process and push the reader to explore from within. Thanks for introducing me to such a simple, but yet compelling blog. Great review!
Extra Credit Response to Allison Stearman's Post
Allison,
This blog is so heartfelt, and emotionally compelling. As a father I understand that connection with your child, and I can't imagine the tumultuous roller coaster that this family has been on.
I went to the site, and I am now a follower. I actually sat for almost two hours and read over all the entries. It is a beautiful blog that depicts the survival of something so special, human life.Maxwell is a trooper and so are his parents. I sympathize with the family because of the harrowing emotions they must have felt and are still feeling.
I think that this blog has served two very important purposes. The first being to collectively keep family and friends abreast of the constant strides that Maxwell is making. The second is simply the joy of parenthood. Although Maxwell's parents are joyous of his triumphs, this blog allows them to do what all other parents do, celebrate their child's firsts' of everything. Although Maxwell's health provided a struggle, this blog has allowed his parents to celebrate his firsts of many things, that we as parents of our children earmark.
This was a great entry and I want to thank you for giving me a reason to be thankful, just by visiting this blog.
This blog is so heartfelt, and emotionally compelling. As a father I understand that connection with your child, and I can't imagine the tumultuous roller coaster that this family has been on.
I went to the site, and I am now a follower. I actually sat for almost two hours and read over all the entries. It is a beautiful blog that depicts the survival of something so special, human life.Maxwell is a trooper and so are his parents. I sympathize with the family because of the harrowing emotions they must have felt and are still feeling.
I think that this blog has served two very important purposes. The first being to collectively keep family and friends abreast of the constant strides that Maxwell is making. The second is simply the joy of parenthood. Although Maxwell's parents are joyous of his triumphs, this blog allows them to do what all other parents do, celebrate their child's firsts' of everything. Although Maxwell's health provided a struggle, this blog has allowed his parents to celebrate his firsts of many things, that we as parents of our children earmark.
This was a great entry and I want to thank you for giving me a reason to be thankful, just by visiting this blog.
Response to Monique Talley's Final Blog Entry
Monique,
I just finished looking over your followed blog, and I have to admit that I rather liked the content. I will be the first to say that my religious beliefs are stagnant, and although I do believe in God, I have chose to keep my thoughts on God to myself.
With that said, http:////sharonjaynes.com/blog is definitely focused toward women and their commitment to the bible, and a firm relationship with God. However I did find some interesting connotation's that were "man friendly". I apologize for trying to be stereotypical; I hope you understand what I am implying by "man friendly".
One entry in particular caught my eye about a family vacation, and a view of Alcatraz. The blogger comments about this trip and the transition of a prisoner challenged and changed. The bible verse of “You shall know the truth and the truth shall make you free” (John 8:32 NA SB), was a perfect testament of her discovery in this prisoner.
After reading your post and visiting the blog, I was surprised at the quality of this blog and its content. While it is focused to guide a woman's life with God, I thought that it offered a wealth of well written views and perceptions. I really enjoyed the blog. Great job with your choice and I really enjoyed reading your review.
I just finished looking over your followed blog, and I have to admit that I rather liked the content. I will be the first to say that my religious beliefs are stagnant, and although I do believe in God, I have chose to keep my thoughts on God to myself.
With that said, http:////sharonjaynes.com/blog is definitely focused toward women and their commitment to the bible, and a firm relationship with God. However I did find some interesting connotation's that were "man friendly". I apologize for trying to be stereotypical; I hope you understand what I am implying by "man friendly".
One entry in particular caught my eye about a family vacation, and a view of Alcatraz. The blogger comments about this trip and the transition of a prisoner challenged and changed. The bible verse of “You shall know the truth and the truth shall make you free” (John 8:32 NA SB), was a perfect testament of her discovery in this prisoner.
After reading your post and visiting the blog, I was surprised at the quality of this blog and its content. While it is focused to guide a woman's life with God, I thought that it offered a wealth of well written views and perceptions. I really enjoyed the blog. Great job with your choice and I really enjoyed reading your review.
Unit IIII Blog Entry, Personal Interest Blog
To be quite honest, I subscribe through RSS feeds to a variety of different blogs. While being deployed often, it is rather difficult to keep up with the world. As the media is constantly reporting new stories, I am laboring away inside a large floating piece of metal. Blogs are my salvation. They keep me abreast of the ever changing world. A blog allows me to pick and choose my content, based on my own personal interests. It is almost like cable television; I choose the channels that appeal personally to me. Although I am well aware of blogger biases, that is what makes the reading so intense. A blog allows me to view both the story and the opinion that the blogger wants to express.
After giving much thought on my personal favorite blog, I decided to review, The Yankee Sage. This blog is authored by retired Navy Commander, Chris van Avery. Although I wouldn't specifically cite the author as literally aggressive, his comments and thoughts on integral news are mild, and he is efficient at covering what matters to me.
Mr. van Avery is devoted to his Christian beliefs, and really seems to be a family focused man. These integral pieces of his character are employed through his literary style and blog topic coverage. The Yankee Saga, offers a little bit of everything, while focused on the key elements of government, military, and Christian beliefs. He covers important military headlines with both flair and flop. van Avery blogs about everything military. His focus is on all branches and government, and how the world is affected and defected by them.
I enjoy reading his posts because he comes from the "old Navy" ,and is blogging about the transitions into the "new Navy". Mr. van Avery's blog attempts to encompass both the old and new military styles of leadership, politicking, and patriotism.
I began reading this blog when I was assigned to recruiting duty. His journals on recruiting, in all branches, encouraged my success, by relating his opinions on the qualities that a new sailor would possess. Although very opinionated on these qualities, he made a valid point within a question. "When you are recruiting these new sailors, consider what it would be to work next to them, or mentor them ( 2010)?" I tried to use this as a guideline to help mentor the new recruits to jobs and fields that they would excel in, while being the best sailor that they could be. It is through this blog that I could identify with a very demanding job in the United States Navy.
The blog itself is somewhat eye catching. Personally I preferred the original template, which was a pen and ink design, depicting the oceans and early style battleships. Now the template has transitioned to a scenic view of the country side ,with the roofs of old cottages just peaking out. While I don't think that this template specifically encompasses the blog, it definitely defines the transition that the author has made from nautical company to family contentment.
This blogs aesthetics aren't the reason that I am drawn to Chris van Averys' bias and whit. The template is rather bland, but the organization and easy accessibility to specific posts are superb. Using specific keywords and labels, has allowed me to be my own biased follower. I can read what I choose to read on specific material, without having to skim through something that may not interest me. I am a focused person, and I like to make use of all of my time. The Yankee Sage, allows me to pick out the blog entries that appeal to me, without weeding through excessive comments and personally unrelated subject material.
One of the other most important and rarely seen widgets on this blog is a daily bible verse. I will be blunt and say that my religious practices are rudimentary. But I try to visit this blog daily, just for the Bible Verse of the Day. This little bit of encouragement isn't spattered all over the page, but is visible on the home spot and always attracts my attention.
The Yankee Sage, is a blog of personal interest. While it does give credence to military ideals and agendas, it also offers its followers references and interesting opinions. Chris van Avery has done a fine job of becoming an astute blogger, covering controversial topics with minimum bias, and paving the way for slight influence through his literary writings.
van Avery, Chris. (2010). Christian, Husband, Father, and American. The Yankee Sage.
Retrieved on July 28, 2010, from http://www.yankeesage.us/
After giving much thought on my personal favorite blog, I decided to review, The Yankee Sage. This blog is authored by retired Navy Commander, Chris van Avery. Although I wouldn't specifically cite the author as literally aggressive, his comments and thoughts on integral news are mild, and he is efficient at covering what matters to me.
Mr. van Avery is devoted to his Christian beliefs, and really seems to be a family focused man. These integral pieces of his character are employed through his literary style and blog topic coverage. The Yankee Saga, offers a little bit of everything, while focused on the key elements of government, military, and Christian beliefs. He covers important military headlines with both flair and flop. van Avery blogs about everything military. His focus is on all branches and government, and how the world is affected and defected by them.
I enjoy reading his posts because he comes from the "old Navy" ,and is blogging about the transitions into the "new Navy". Mr. van Avery's blog attempts to encompass both the old and new military styles of leadership, politicking, and patriotism.
I began reading this blog when I was assigned to recruiting duty. His journals on recruiting, in all branches, encouraged my success, by relating his opinions on the qualities that a new sailor would possess. Although very opinionated on these qualities, he made a valid point within a question. "When you are recruiting these new sailors, consider what it would be to work next to them, or mentor them ( 2010)?" I tried to use this as a guideline to help mentor the new recruits to jobs and fields that they would excel in, while being the best sailor that they could be. It is through this blog that I could identify with a very demanding job in the United States Navy.
The blog itself is somewhat eye catching. Personally I preferred the original template, which was a pen and ink design, depicting the oceans and early style battleships. Now the template has transitioned to a scenic view of the country side ,with the roofs of old cottages just peaking out. While I don't think that this template specifically encompasses the blog, it definitely defines the transition that the author has made from nautical company to family contentment.
This blogs aesthetics aren't the reason that I am drawn to Chris van Averys' bias and whit. The template is rather bland, but the organization and easy accessibility to specific posts are superb. Using specific keywords and labels, has allowed me to be my own biased follower. I can read what I choose to read on specific material, without having to skim through something that may not interest me. I am a focused person, and I like to make use of all of my time. The Yankee Sage, allows me to pick out the blog entries that appeal to me, without weeding through excessive comments and personally unrelated subject material.
One of the other most important and rarely seen widgets on this blog is a daily bible verse. I will be blunt and say that my religious practices are rudimentary. But I try to visit this blog daily, just for the Bible Verse of the Day. This little bit of encouragement isn't spattered all over the page, but is visible on the home spot and always attracts my attention.
The Yankee Sage, is a blog of personal interest. While it does give credence to military ideals and agendas, it also offers its followers references and interesting opinions. Chris van Avery has done a fine job of becoming an astute blogger, covering controversial topics with minimum bias, and paving the way for slight influence through his literary writings.
van Avery, Chris. (2010). Christian, Husband, Father, and American. The Yankee Sage.
Retrieved on July 28, 2010, from http://www.yankeesage.us/
Sunday, July 18, 2010
Extra Credit Response to Dayna Clark Unit III
Dayna,
The emotional response that you have personally elicited to this book, alone, conveys its appeals. I will definitely consider purchasing it.
As I read through the scenario, it seems that there are a few dystopias going on as well, from just reading your blog. Obviously the utopian options allow for the creation of their perfect individual lives. When I make reference to multiple dystopias, I feel like I am seeing one in both the unnatural society, as well as having to choose death as the last option of choice, when no other fits your needs as an individual.
How strange to actually force a society to love and care for a child, because of their choice, when it should be automatic and not choice interpreted. Anyway I am probably reading way into this and now I definitely need the book, my curiosity is piqued. Great Job, this was a great choice for appeal.
The emotional response that you have personally elicited to this book, alone, conveys its appeals. I will definitely consider purchasing it.
As I read through the scenario, it seems that there are a few dystopias going on as well, from just reading your blog. Obviously the utopian options allow for the creation of their perfect individual lives. When I make reference to multiple dystopias, I feel like I am seeing one in both the unnatural society, as well as having to choose death as the last option of choice, when no other fits your needs as an individual.
How strange to actually force a society to love and care for a child, because of their choice, when it should be automatic and not choice interpreted. Anyway I am probably reading way into this and now I definitely need the book, my curiosity is piqued. Great Job, this was a great choice for appeal.
Extra Credit Response to Lowell Harris Unit III
Lowell,
This is a great pick, and obviously covers all the appeals in a wide array. Saving Private Ryan, is definitely one of my personal favorite movies. The only thing that I feel I might disagree with, would be that, a perfect utopia of war could even exist with all the leader's having Captain Miller's leadership, and moral qualities. The problem with that would be, that there wouldn't be a war. His leadership qualities, and strong affirmations of justice, would end whatever conflict could possibly arise, and therefore the perfect war would be neither lost, nor won, just non-existent. I completely agree with the innate skills that Captain Miller has to offer, but in order for utopia and dystopia to conjoin, I think we need to remove the element of perfection. Captain Miller is the perfect leader, perfect soldier, and to be quite honest it is very hard to see his flaws. He is almost super-human. Just thoughts!!! Great Blog!
This is a great pick, and obviously covers all the appeals in a wide array. Saving Private Ryan, is definitely one of my personal favorite movies. The only thing that I feel I might disagree with, would be that, a perfect utopia of war could even exist with all the leader's having Captain Miller's leadership, and moral qualities. The problem with that would be, that there wouldn't be a war. His leadership qualities, and strong affirmations of justice, would end whatever conflict could possibly arise, and therefore the perfect war would be neither lost, nor won, just non-existent. I completely agree with the innate skills that Captain Miller has to offer, but in order for utopia and dystopia to conjoin, I think we need to remove the element of perfection. Captain Miller is the perfect leader, perfect soldier, and to be quite honest it is very hard to see his flaws. He is almost super-human. Just thoughts!!! Great Blog!
Extra Credit Reponse to Allison Stearman Unit III Blog
Allison,
As we are both doing the same question, it is a little bit harder to comment on your post!:) I agree with your pathos appeal of reasoning. The pathos appeal in this story is everywhere, from the family as your referenced, to the lone house and even the family dog. As you have pointed out, with the silhouettes of the family, Bradbury appeals to our emotions, but I almost even feel a sadness for the house who must feign ignorance at the loss of its creators.
This short story has all the specifications of a perfect utopia. Society strives for perfection even though it seemingly isn't possible. Obviously this perfection, undisturbed, proffers the utopia. Nuclear war, loss and even a fire, play the hero's of dystopias in the story.
I also see the logos appeal as well within this short story. As you talked about the time stamp in you post, I feel that the logos appeal, exists in that time stamp. Logically the time setting continues through each and every heading and offers a this appeal. Logical interpretations of reasoning are subsequent throughout this short story, which seems to give it a realistic avenue, meaning that it could really happen. Great Blog!
As we are both doing the same question, it is a little bit harder to comment on your post!:) I agree with your pathos appeal of reasoning. The pathos appeal in this story is everywhere, from the family as your referenced, to the lone house and even the family dog. As you have pointed out, with the silhouettes of the family, Bradbury appeals to our emotions, but I almost even feel a sadness for the house who must feign ignorance at the loss of its creators.
This short story has all the specifications of a perfect utopia. Society strives for perfection even though it seemingly isn't possible. Obviously this perfection, undisturbed, proffers the utopia. Nuclear war, loss and even a fire, play the hero's of dystopias in the story.
I also see the logos appeal as well within this short story. As you talked about the time stamp in you post, I feel that the logos appeal, exists in that time stamp. Logically the time setting continues through each and every heading and offers a this appeal. Logical interpretations of reasoning are subsequent throughout this short story, which seems to give it a realistic avenue, meaning that it could really happen. Great Blog!
Response to Monique Talley Unit III Blog
Monique,
I was really intrigued by your rhetorical appeal of your advertisement. I agree, that it is true, that advertising appeals to those who strive to be someone else or who want to emulate their favorite celebrities. It seems that society as a whole is looking for that extra something to bring on a strong sense of appeal and status. While the advertisement does play on ethos, announcing its creditably while using an actor to sell the product, I also see the pathos in your advertisement. Sexuality is an emotional appeal that is very apparent in the Avon advertisement. Patrick Dempsey seems be an iconic sex symbol and Avon is using his status to sell their product. I suppose that women would want to buy this for their husbands, in hopes of their husbands smelling like Patrick Dempsey. Or maybe just the idea of Patrick Dempsey in general, it is almost fantasy like. Honestly I don't know that many men that patronize Avon, other than my father. He brought their products with fervor, and swore by them, because he felt they offered a variety of appeals. Therefore Avon advertising is doing their job, selling a product with different aspects of appeals. Very cool analysis. Good Job!
I was really intrigued by your rhetorical appeal of your advertisement. I agree, that it is true, that advertising appeals to those who strive to be someone else or who want to emulate their favorite celebrities. It seems that society as a whole is looking for that extra something to bring on a strong sense of appeal and status. While the advertisement does play on ethos, announcing its creditably while using an actor to sell the product, I also see the pathos in your advertisement. Sexuality is an emotional appeal that is very apparent in the Avon advertisement. Patrick Dempsey seems be an iconic sex symbol and Avon is using his status to sell their product. I suppose that women would want to buy this for their husbands, in hopes of their husbands smelling like Patrick Dempsey. Or maybe just the idea of Patrick Dempsey in general, it is almost fantasy like. Honestly I don't know that many men that patronize Avon, other than my father. He brought their products with fervor, and swore by them, because he felt they offered a variety of appeals. Therefore Avon advertising is doing their job, selling a product with different aspects of appeals. Very cool analysis. Good Job!
Friday, July 16, 2010
Unit III Rhetorical Writing Response
Ray Bradbury's short story, "There will come soft rains", has an exceptional rhetoric appeal of both pathos and ethos. Penned in the 1950's, its author's thought processes are the fear induced dangers of the era; the Cold War. This short story envelopes its readers with images of mass destruction; which in turn counter illicit feelings of despair and bereft sadness.
After reviewing this short story many times, and I do mean many, I was surprised at how many different conflicts were present. Each aspect of the story represented an emotion or view in which to bring the reader in.
Bradbury brings in his readers utilizing pathos, or the appeal of emotion, with the autonomy of the house. The robotic house is reliant upon humans, but yet still maintains its functions, even in the onset of mass societal destruction. Although the house is supposedly emotionless, the reader can feel its need for existence and perfection. Without routine, it too would disappear with all its inner workings.
As the reader is introduced to the house, it starts the days as any other, repeating the date and its location; "August 4, 2026, Allendale, California". This thrice noted intro implies the need for normalcy and continuation. As the house brings in the reader, it almost takes on a humanistic entity, moving forward through the daily routine of breakfast and sending the owner off to work, unaware of the current tragedy. As the short story evolves, its emotional appeal of pathos indulges the reader's fear by bringing in an entity that humans can relate to, the family dog. Although the house recognizes the entity of the dog, it is technologically blind to the radiation poisoning that the dog has succumbed to. With no emotion,the house cleans up the remains of the dying dog, as if it was only a dust bunny, sending it to the incinerator to be disposed of.
Ethos, the second appeal in this short story, brings a sound credibility to Bradbury himself. His personnel fears combined with the onset of living during the Cold War, gives the short story an edge of credibility. Bradbury conveys to the readers the reality of what the end could bring without an intervention.The title that Bradbury chose, "There will be soft rain", implies the quiet, creeping onset of a nuclear disaster, just as that of a soft comforting rain blowing in unannounced, unchanging. Bradbury brings to the story the reality that yes this is a possibility, if we as society,aren't careful. During the Cold War, society feared the unknown and Bradbury brought society the unknown, creating a vision of what would happen to their "perfect life". "There will be soft rain", has the tenure of an author's credibility. Bradbury's own personal fear of a nuclear war offers the authenticity of his resolve.
The utopia of "There will be soft rain", represents the idyllic society of automated houses, perfect afternoons of playing cards, and evenings spent with cigars. Every aspect of this Utopian world is systamatically organized, from the robotic house to the perfect family. A visual of what a perfect life is, unchallenged in every way. As Bradbury picturesquely describes the dust prints of the family, it is rather idyllic that there last moment was together, spending quality time on a perfect afternoon in a perfect world. It is the perfect life with a perfect house, perfect family and even the idea of living in the perfect suburb.
Obvious dystopia is presented through that of a nuclear war. It is this nuclear disaster that brings chaos and measures the synapse of a perfect reality. The autonomy of the house alone, continuing its duties for no one, just to continue the ideology of a perfect world, confronts the reader with the charge of realizing that such an autonomy is non-existent and that facing the truth is divine.
After reviewing this short story many times, and I do mean many, I was surprised at how many different conflicts were present. Each aspect of the story represented an emotion or view in which to bring the reader in.
Bradbury brings in his readers utilizing pathos, or the appeal of emotion, with the autonomy of the house. The robotic house is reliant upon humans, but yet still maintains its functions, even in the onset of mass societal destruction. Although the house is supposedly emotionless, the reader can feel its need for existence and perfection. Without routine, it too would disappear with all its inner workings.
As the reader is introduced to the house, it starts the days as any other, repeating the date and its location; "August 4, 2026, Allendale, California". This thrice noted intro implies the need for normalcy and continuation. As the house brings in the reader, it almost takes on a humanistic entity, moving forward through the daily routine of breakfast and sending the owner off to work, unaware of the current tragedy. As the short story evolves, its emotional appeal of pathos indulges the reader's fear by bringing in an entity that humans can relate to, the family dog. Although the house recognizes the entity of the dog, it is technologically blind to the radiation poisoning that the dog has succumbed to. With no emotion,the house cleans up the remains of the dying dog, as if it was only a dust bunny, sending it to the incinerator to be disposed of.
Ethos, the second appeal in this short story, brings a sound credibility to Bradbury himself. His personnel fears combined with the onset of living during the Cold War, gives the short story an edge of credibility. Bradbury conveys to the readers the reality of what the end could bring without an intervention.The title that Bradbury chose, "There will be soft rain", implies the quiet, creeping onset of a nuclear disaster, just as that of a soft comforting rain blowing in unannounced, unchanging. Bradbury brings to the story the reality that yes this is a possibility, if we as society,aren't careful. During the Cold War, society feared the unknown and Bradbury brought society the unknown, creating a vision of what would happen to their "perfect life". "There will be soft rain", has the tenure of an author's credibility. Bradbury's own personal fear of a nuclear war offers the authenticity of his resolve.
The utopia of "There will be soft rain", represents the idyllic society of automated houses, perfect afternoons of playing cards, and evenings spent with cigars. Every aspect of this Utopian world is systamatically organized, from the robotic house to the perfect family. A visual of what a perfect life is, unchallenged in every way. As Bradbury picturesquely describes the dust prints of the family, it is rather idyllic that there last moment was together, spending quality time on a perfect afternoon in a perfect world. It is the perfect life with a perfect house, perfect family and even the idea of living in the perfect suburb.
Obvious dystopia is presented through that of a nuclear war. It is this nuclear disaster that brings chaos and measures the synapse of a perfect reality. The autonomy of the house alone, continuing its duties for no one, just to continue the ideology of a perfect world, confronts the reader with the charge of realizing that such an autonomy is non-existent and that facing the truth is divine.
Saturday, July 3, 2010
Extra Credit Response to Lowell Harris Blog Entry Unit II
Lowell,
I have to say that I do agree with you as far as McChrystal's career of service is concerned. His track record is impeccable, and therefore should have been considered first and foremost. But as I have recently noticed, regardless of a superior career track record, no one is safe. It is almost as if every individual through the ranks is being closely scrutinized. One act of human nature can ruin your military career forever.
Unfortunately in regards to McChrystal, the situation deems that even off the record, comments are not sacred. Though journalists are held to a code of ethics, I feel that they should be held accountable legally, for confrontational situations such as these. They have destroyed a career that cannot be repaired, all to score a story which will enhance their own personal career. It seems that just as with any other ladder of employment, individuals want to race to the top and stop on anyone in their way.I do want to say though, that unfortunately when you are in a position such as McChrystral, you can't even make a statement off the record. This is a double jeopardy career killer. Public officials are held to a different standard and anything they say or do is going to be chastised, even if it is for the greater good of our society.
Troop moral obviously will be affected regardless. They learn that speaking up for the good or the bad is a very dangerous act. Fighting for your country seems to be a taboo job. Everyone has a position on the job that the military does, but yet they don't want to be the ones to step up to do it. The media creates a negative frenzy in this relationship. They minimize the features on the courageous efforts and focus on the dramatic light of dishonorable actions. True to nature the media has created a foundation not based on human error, but instead on the perfect human. If you can't locate the ideology to be the perfect human.....your ruined. Great Subject to blog about!
I have to say that I do agree with you as far as McChrystal's career of service is concerned. His track record is impeccable, and therefore should have been considered first and foremost. But as I have recently noticed, regardless of a superior career track record, no one is safe. It is almost as if every individual through the ranks is being closely scrutinized. One act of human nature can ruin your military career forever.
Unfortunately in regards to McChrystal, the situation deems that even off the record, comments are not sacred. Though journalists are held to a code of ethics, I feel that they should be held accountable legally, for confrontational situations such as these. They have destroyed a career that cannot be repaired, all to score a story which will enhance their own personal career. It seems that just as with any other ladder of employment, individuals want to race to the top and stop on anyone in their way.I do want to say though, that unfortunately when you are in a position such as McChrystral, you can't even make a statement off the record. This is a double jeopardy career killer. Public officials are held to a different standard and anything they say or do is going to be chastised, even if it is for the greater good of our society.
Troop moral obviously will be affected regardless. They learn that speaking up for the good or the bad is a very dangerous act. Fighting for your country seems to be a taboo job. Everyone has a position on the job that the military does, but yet they don't want to be the ones to step up to do it. The media creates a negative frenzy in this relationship. They minimize the features on the courageous efforts and focus on the dramatic light of dishonorable actions. True to nature the media has created a foundation not based on human error, but instead on the perfect human. If you can't locate the ideology to be the perfect human.....your ruined. Great Subject to blog about!
Thursday, July 1, 2010
Extra Credit Blog Response Unit II to Monique Talley
Monique,
While I believe that the media can be hopeful and respondent to write an article that offers true humanity, I think about the author first of that kind of article. As I read your blog I had a moment of reflection. It seems as though all journalists have a starting point or a finishing point. Their beginning and end dictate what they perceive as "news". Articles that focus on humanity definitely deserve more credit than they receive. Though my opinion of the media is still biased, that doesn't mean that I don't have a deep rooted respect for a journalist that writes about the goodness in this world. I liked your approach to your blog. It seems that your focus was on a specific journalistic style versus journalism in entirety. This comment is not meant to be negative in any way, I am just looking at your blog in a rather refreshing perspective. In my opinion drama and theatrics sell; its what's wholesome that doesn't. But what makes this type of journalism special is that it is pure in all respects and offers a greater good to our society. I wish that more journalists could consider this perspective and utilize it to their advantage. Great job on focusing on a wholesome side to journalism!
While I believe that the media can be hopeful and respondent to write an article that offers true humanity, I think about the author first of that kind of article. As I read your blog I had a moment of reflection. It seems as though all journalists have a starting point or a finishing point. Their beginning and end dictate what they perceive as "news". Articles that focus on humanity definitely deserve more credit than they receive. Though my opinion of the media is still biased, that doesn't mean that I don't have a deep rooted respect for a journalist that writes about the goodness in this world. I liked your approach to your blog. It seems that your focus was on a specific journalistic style versus journalism in entirety. This comment is not meant to be negative in any way, I am just looking at your blog in a rather refreshing perspective. In my opinion drama and theatrics sell; its what's wholesome that doesn't. But what makes this type of journalism special is that it is pure in all respects and offers a greater good to our society. I wish that more journalists could consider this perspective and utilize it to their advantage. Great job on focusing on a wholesome side to journalism!
Extra Credit Post Responding to Dayna Clark Jones
Dayna,
My interpretation of your blog may have taken me to the wayside a bit, but I really liked the focus. While I am a sports guru, I am ashamed to say that I honestly didn't pay attention to the riots. Did I hear about them? Well yes. But I am an example of society and how certain aspects of media affect us. I was focused more on the LA Lakers and their win to really think or even pay attention to any negative media. Which brings me back to both your point and mine. Your absolutely right, I too googled the riots and it wasn't a lack of correct search tactics, it more the scenario of not really reporting on the story. Obviously this is a reflection of both the media and a brand name. The media to a certain extent only reports what they are told to, and obviously they are limited on certain "touchy" topics. That is apparent with this situation. Why would the media take away from a multi-billion dollar business just to talk about a "little riot"? That is the sad part about the media. It almost seems to me that they can be bought and paid for like a material item. How insane!! They aren't going to report on a riot when the LA Lakers just won, that is their most important priority....or story I mean. The media in all forms must be held accountable. Well done on your blog.....the end justified the mean.
My interpretation of your blog may have taken me to the wayside a bit, but I really liked the focus. While I am a sports guru, I am ashamed to say that I honestly didn't pay attention to the riots. Did I hear about them? Well yes. But I am an example of society and how certain aspects of media affect us. I was focused more on the LA Lakers and their win to really think or even pay attention to any negative media. Which brings me back to both your point and mine. Your absolutely right, I too googled the riots and it wasn't a lack of correct search tactics, it more the scenario of not really reporting on the story. Obviously this is a reflection of both the media and a brand name. The media to a certain extent only reports what they are told to, and obviously they are limited on certain "touchy" topics. That is apparent with this situation. Why would the media take away from a multi-billion dollar business just to talk about a "little riot"? That is the sad part about the media. It almost seems to me that they can be bought and paid for like a material item. How insane!! They aren't going to report on a riot when the LA Lakers just won, that is their most important priority....or story I mean. The media in all forms must be held accountable. Well done on your blog.....the end justified the mean.
Response to Allison Stearman's Unit II Blog
Allison,
I empathize with your opinion on the negative media coverage that the oil spill, in the Gulf, has received. I too have been following the media coverage over the spill, and to be honest, I can't imagine a positive light to this disaster. Your right though, all of the media finger pointing hasn't resolved the issue!
But I must say I feel that the media was forced to focus on the negative in this instance, because for a very long time all the relief efforts were kept secured. What else could reporters possibly report.... only the negative? I had watched a story on CNN, where a journalist was questioning relief staff and they were literally being paid to keep the situation private. All of the workers had no comment. With respect to that,I do find that it may be hard for the media to report anything in a positive and truthful manner about the oil disaster, due to the fact that both BP and our own government didn't want to release any strategies to the public at that time. The holding of information really defamed BP's character.
While I feel that everyone does deserve time away for a leave of absents, those in the public eye,unfortunately, have to make guarded choices in comparison to you or I, as to their activities. The media, I feel does thrive on the negativity, because let's be honest how much more likely are we to watch something dramatic versus a story that is heartfelt. Our cultural ideals of what the media should report have gradually changed, though I'm not sure it's for the better. Your blog entry definitely tackled the reality of the media coverage though. You touched on many of the circumstances that are being reported and how grotesquely the media distorts them!! Good Job!
I empathize with your opinion on the negative media coverage that the oil spill, in the Gulf, has received. I too have been following the media coverage over the spill, and to be honest, I can't imagine a positive light to this disaster. Your right though, all of the media finger pointing hasn't resolved the issue!
But I must say I feel that the media was forced to focus on the negative in this instance, because for a very long time all the relief efforts were kept secured. What else could reporters possibly report.... only the negative? I had watched a story on CNN, where a journalist was questioning relief staff and they were literally being paid to keep the situation private. All of the workers had no comment. With respect to that,I do find that it may be hard for the media to report anything in a positive and truthful manner about the oil disaster, due to the fact that both BP and our own government didn't want to release any strategies to the public at that time. The holding of information really defamed BP's character.
While I feel that everyone does deserve time away for a leave of absents, those in the public eye,unfortunately, have to make guarded choices in comparison to you or I, as to their activities. The media, I feel does thrive on the negativity, because let's be honest how much more likely are we to watch something dramatic versus a story that is heartfelt. Our cultural ideals of what the media should report have gradually changed, though I'm not sure it's for the better. Your blog entry definitely tackled the reality of the media coverage though. You touched on many of the circumstances that are being reported and how grotesquely the media distorts them!! Good Job!
Tuesday, June 29, 2010
Unit II Journalist Style and Impact on Society
Did your alarm go off this morning? I know that mine did. My cell phone let me know that it was time to get up and start the coffee. My cell phone also reminded me of my afternoon appointments. I receive approximately thirty phone calls a day; I'm embarrassed to even count the text messages. Oh and I surf the net, check my email, and use my GPS application to get me where I need to go. My cell phone is for all intents and purposes my personal assistant; but my personal assistant should have come with a warning label on the outside of the box!
"It's a radiation-emitting device that we buy for our ourselves. I think we are asking the wrong question, whether or not they have been proven to be unsafe. The question should be, have they been proven safe."(Sullivan, 2010.) While the cell phone industries media outlets have implied that cell phone's are safe; obviously their written word is biased for their own business benefit. Cell phone complications seem to be a debatable specter amidst all areas of mass media. As cell phone usage surges, we as a society seem to be ignorant to the dilemma that could possibly arise from the third ear we have adorned.
In a Wake Up Call, by Robert Sullivan,the potential health deformities or risks of cell phone use are widespread throughout the human anatomy. He states that low sperm count in males, brain tumors, both benign and malignant on the side of the brain where the phone is utilized the most, and early onset of Alzheimer's are all complications that could arise from use(Sullivan,2010). Sullivan is straight forward about the risks, but how heinous that other journalists and media outlets seem to mask the potential dangers (2010). Alternative media outlets have outlined these significant health risks in their mildest forms, but still fail to provide an informative reality that we all may face; severe health problems from radiation-emitting devices.
The Food and Drug Administration and the Federal Communications Commission have stated that cell phones are not harmful. The FCC/FDA Web site "stresses that no scientific evidence has been published demonstrating harm from short- term exposures to low levels of RF energy"(2010). Questions of the hour: When did we start using our cell phones on a short term basis...? What defines a short term usage? Is this what they want society to know or want society to believe? I would normally take their written word....no questions asked, and believe in its validity. This is coming from a government media outlet. It serves society as an educational and truthful written resource. As I have examined the potential cell phone dangers, the FCC/FDA website is technically correct. The last studies performed were in 1999, the website was updated in June of 2010. The question society should be asking is this: It is 2010; Who is lobbying for new studies and who will document and disperse its findings honestly to society?
Good Morning America ran a very limited two minute piece discussing the health risks of cell phone usage. How informative can one be in two minutes? This live news media seems to edge around the real risks of cell phone usage in hopes of portraying a "slanted" perception to society. That perception as I viewed it, is this: There are documented risks, but we as a media source need to eliminate any controversy within our outlet. Journalism at its best should provide an unbiased, honest view of the truth and be held accountable for that truth. As with Good Morning America, they should be responsible to the public about the health risks, not creeping around their personal libel.
Journalism in its most basic form of the written word, warns us of cell phone usage health risks in informative articles that counter reference latent studies. Though the many articles penned on health advisories, when using cell phones, are informative, they seem to ignore the most basic fact: there are no current studies to help the public make an informative health decision. As the articles show there are only biased opinions. Journalism should cover the truth with no repercussions from society. If it is the truth that we as a society yearn for, then it should be the truth that we are reading, watching and listening to, regardless of the information proffered.
http://fcc.gov/
http://www.hulu.com/watch/156878/abc-good-morning-america-labeling-cell-phone-radiation-amounts
Sullivan, Robert. (2010, July). Wake up Call. Men's Health, 61-63.
http://trueslant.com/franjohns/2010/06/22/cell-phone-radiation-danger-true-or-false/
"It's a radiation-emitting device that we buy for our ourselves. I think we are asking the wrong question, whether or not they have been proven to be unsafe. The question should be, have they been proven safe."(Sullivan, 2010.) While the cell phone industries media outlets have implied that cell phone's are safe; obviously their written word is biased for their own business benefit. Cell phone complications seem to be a debatable specter amidst all areas of mass media. As cell phone usage surges, we as a society seem to be ignorant to the dilemma that could possibly arise from the third ear we have adorned.
In a Wake Up Call, by Robert Sullivan,the potential health deformities or risks of cell phone use are widespread throughout the human anatomy. He states that low sperm count in males, brain tumors, both benign and malignant on the side of the brain where the phone is utilized the most, and early onset of Alzheimer's are all complications that could arise from use(Sullivan,2010). Sullivan is straight forward about the risks, but how heinous that other journalists and media outlets seem to mask the potential dangers (2010). Alternative media outlets have outlined these significant health risks in their mildest forms, but still fail to provide an informative reality that we all may face; severe health problems from radiation-emitting devices.
The Food and Drug Administration and the Federal Communications Commission have stated that cell phones are not harmful. The FCC/FDA Web site "stresses that no scientific evidence has been published demonstrating harm from short- term exposures to low levels of RF energy"(2010). Questions of the hour: When did we start using our cell phones on a short term basis...? What defines a short term usage? Is this what they want society to know or want society to believe? I would normally take their written word....no questions asked, and believe in its validity. This is coming from a government media outlet. It serves society as an educational and truthful written resource. As I have examined the potential cell phone dangers, the FCC/FDA website is technically correct. The last studies performed were in 1999, the website was updated in June of 2010. The question society should be asking is this: It is 2010; Who is lobbying for new studies and who will document and disperse its findings honestly to society?
Good Morning America ran a very limited two minute piece discussing the health risks of cell phone usage. How informative can one be in two minutes? This live news media seems to edge around the real risks of cell phone usage in hopes of portraying a "slanted" perception to society. That perception as I viewed it, is this: There are documented risks, but we as a media source need to eliminate any controversy within our outlet. Journalism at its best should provide an unbiased, honest view of the truth and be held accountable for that truth. As with Good Morning America, they should be responsible to the public about the health risks, not creeping around their personal libel.
Journalism in its most basic form of the written word, warns us of cell phone usage health risks in informative articles that counter reference latent studies. Though the many articles penned on health advisories, when using cell phones, are informative, they seem to ignore the most basic fact: there are no current studies to help the public make an informative health decision. As the articles show there are only biased opinions. Journalism should cover the truth with no repercussions from society. If it is the truth that we as a society yearn for, then it should be the truth that we are reading, watching and listening to, regardless of the information proffered.
http://fcc.gov/
http://www.hulu.com/watch/156878/abc-good-morning-america-labeling-cell-phone-radiation-amounts
Sullivan, Robert. (2010, July). Wake up Call. Men's Health, 61-63.
http://trueslant.com/franjohns/2010/06/22/cell-phone-radiation-danger-true-or-false/
Friday, June 18, 2010
Response to William Crawford Blog Fictive Memoir
Joe Lewis Comp I Blog said...
William this entry was very humane. You touched on some of the deepest inner emotions that we all feel but yet don't quite express. To suffer such trauma and carnage and to also deal with it when a loved one cannot handle it is such an excruciating process. But yet to beat all odds and overcome is the most perfect process of being human. I really sympathized with your character as well as the circumstances. It is such tragedy to suffer in life but in your entry you show that with suffrage comes a personal redemption process that I really appreciate.
June 18, 2010 10:20 AM
William this entry was very humane. You touched on some of the deepest inner emotions that we all feel but yet don't quite express. To suffer such trauma and carnage and to also deal with it when a loved one cannot handle it is such an excruciating process. But yet to beat all odds and overcome is the most perfect process of being human. I really sympathized with your character as well as the circumstances. It is such tragedy to suffer in life but in your entry you show that with suffrage comes a personal redemption process that I really appreciate.
June 18, 2010 10:20 AM
I - Fictive Memoir Entry
That night Collin lay restless as the storm fought against the sides of the little white and green clapboard shack. Thinking to himself he tried to gauge the severity of the situation. The forecasters had only predicted a minor tropical storm, but they had said that about the earlier two storms in the last few weeks, which turned into Category I hurricane's and had dropped almost 12 inches of rain. "Rain", he thought, "I can't handle any more rain".
Around 4:30 that morning he awoke to a strong clap of thunder. Startled he got up to use the bathroom and flipped the light switch, no power. "Oh great", Collin growled. As he leaned over the sink to wash the perspiration off his face, the floor under his feet felt slippery, almost slimy wet. Collin thought maybe he had left the window open, but no, everything was closed. As he leaned down he felt the vent covering and was startled by the water that was pushing through the floor of his little clapboard shack. Immediately he hurried toward the kitchen and the front door.
As Collin opened the front door water rushed in uninvited over his feet. The water poured in through the door like a dam that had just busted. What Collin didn't realize at that moment is a levy had swelled and busted. The cotton fields were now an ocean, the highway a memory, and the neighbors in the small North Carolina community of Princeville alone in an ocean that came from no where.
He immediately ran back for his wife Kelli and there little girl Meg. He had to find a way to get them out of this place. The place he had dragged them to for his work, to study cotton plants and insecticides.
Collin leaped back away from the door and ran down the hall. He threw on the stained work paints and broken in boots and a simple white t-shirt. He needed to find safety for his family. Right now that was looking like the top of his house. As Collin tried to calm Kelli's screams, Meg asked for her kitten. "Daddy, Daddy, I need to find Patches." A single tear slipped across Collin's face and he scooped Meg up and ran for the door. He transferred his daughter to his wife and began to swim.
Collin swam for the road across his little lawn that was now the ocean. He fought the current to get to the truck which he hoped would provide a rescue for his family. He knew that Kelli would never be able to fight this flooding current and hold onto Meg at the same time. He needed to find a way. Any way to get them away from the once beautiful acres and acres of white fluffy cotton.
http://www.wral.com/news/local/story/6037817/
Around 4:30 that morning he awoke to a strong clap of thunder. Startled he got up to use the bathroom and flipped the light switch, no power. "Oh great", Collin growled. As he leaned over the sink to wash the perspiration off his face, the floor under his feet felt slippery, almost slimy wet. Collin thought maybe he had left the window open, but no, everything was closed. As he leaned down he felt the vent covering and was startled by the water that was pushing through the floor of his little clapboard shack. Immediately he hurried toward the kitchen and the front door.
As Collin opened the front door water rushed in uninvited over his feet. The water poured in through the door like a dam that had just busted. What Collin didn't realize at that moment is a levy had swelled and busted. The cotton fields were now an ocean, the highway a memory, and the neighbors in the small North Carolina community of Princeville alone in an ocean that came from no where.
He immediately ran back for his wife Kelli and there little girl Meg. He had to find a way to get them out of this place. The place he had dragged them to for his work, to study cotton plants and insecticides.
Collin leaped back away from the door and ran down the hall. He threw on the stained work paints and broken in boots and a simple white t-shirt. He needed to find safety for his family. Right now that was looking like the top of his house. As Collin tried to calm Kelli's screams, Meg asked for her kitten. "Daddy, Daddy, I need to find Patches." A single tear slipped across Collin's face and he scooped Meg up and ran for the door. He transferred his daughter to his wife and began to swim.
Collin swam for the road across his little lawn that was now the ocean. He fought the current to get to the truck which he hoped would provide a rescue for his family. He knew that Kelli would never be able to fight this flooding current and hold onto Meg at the same time. He needed to find a way. Any way to get them away from the once beautiful acres and acres of white fluffy cotton.
http://www.wral.com/news/local/story/6037817/
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)