Amanda,
I must admit our line of thinking is along the same parallel. It is a shame that Lindzen uses his blog forum as a stand for mockery and distaste for others, when he should be a posting a model post. His credentials, while admirable, are made personally defragmented by his ill-attempt at convincing his readers to dismiss global warming trends. The one reprieve that Lindzen has is that it is his blog and his forum of bias is allowed. Unfortunately his blog doesn’t have to serve any tasteful forum because it is his opinion. The downfall is that it doesn’t seem to sway anyone in favor for his unethical soapbox. It is sad that he seems to be more concerned with convincing defamation, than to sway his reader’s minds that there could possibly be a hidden truth of groundless global warming effects.
Also I am pleased that we both are sound in Biello's article in the Scientific American. He too is biased, but maintains legitimate sources to back up his founded truths of global warming trends.
While both authors are well credentialed, these articles show how far oppositions are on such controversial social issues’. These two articles also show the ignorance of single-minded intelligence!
Your comment about making the world livable and humanity stepping up for that, is a great ending to a serious issue that Lindzen seems to ignore.
Great Post!!
No comments:
Post a Comment