Jacob,
I agree totally with your perception of the two articles. Lindzen does seem focused on discrediting Al Gore and his documentary on the global warming crisis versus defending his stand on un-founded global warming trends. With such astringent credentials you would think that Lindzen would want to publish his bias in a more supported light and not defame his own person blog. It is rather sad!!
On the other note of Biello, his bias isn't as blatant and he does use key points of documented evidence to support his opinion of the continuous downfall in the global warming cycle. I have found after reading some of the blog posts that decidedly, many of us do rely on facts versus opinions in order to found our beliefs of a scientific crisis or political view.
While we both interpreted the articles in the same context, it is interesting that it was certain quotes and sources that perpetrated us to do so.
Again I appreciate your opinion and agree totally.
Thanks for the informative blog post!!
No comments:
Post a Comment